personal injury,dallas personal injury,texas personal injury,personal injury law,lawyer,attorney,wrongful death,school hazing,nursing home negligence, nursing home abuse,rsd,crps, accidents, negligence

 

News & Alerts

RSD Information

Curriculum Vitae

Why I Became a Lawyer

My Practice

Areas Of Practice

Case Facts

Reform Facts

Consumer Update

Attorney Profiles

Notices

_________

Turtle Creek
Centre, Ste 1400
3811 Turtle Creek
Dallas, TX 75219
972.774.9883
888.774.9883

E-Mail Us

Personal Injury Lawyers - Dallas - Texas

Reform Facts

THE OTHER SIDE OF THE STORY
ENGLISH RULE

Supporters of legal "reform" advocate adoption of the English rule, also known as "loser pays," on legal fees and costs. They argue that such a rule would deter frivolous lawsuits. However, such a system actually would further erode personal responsibility in America, because it would force injured citizens to back down from holding wrongdoers accountable.

  • The English rule would force injured Americans to shy away from holding wrongdoers accountable because a claim filed against a powerful corporation or government could wipe out these citizens financially if they have to pay the other side's legal fees and costs. Winning a trial is never guaranteed, and the injured party would be faced with this stark reality: You can try to right a wrong, but if all does not go exactly as planned your family gets a one-way ticket to financial ruin and dependency.
  • Even England does not strictly adhere to the English rule. More than half of England's citizens qualify for government-run legal assistance. The English rule rarely applies when the "loser" is a recipient of legal aid.
  • The conservative English magazine The Economist in January called for abandonment of the English Rule and expansion of contingent fees. The magazine stated: "The worst aspect of this system [English Rule] is that it denies access to justice to huge numbers of people."
  • English trade unions provide legal representation to their members and pay the other side's costs if a case is lost.

Without a government-run program to help injured consumers pay legal fees and costs, Americans could not afford to vindicate their rights and wrongdoers would not be held accountable. Has anyone seriously suggested that America needs to replace its system, in which private litigants pay their own expenses, with a government-run program?

Article Reprinted with Permission from
American Association for Justice

<< Back

 


The statements and information provided on this web site are for the information of the recipient only. This site is not intended to provide legal advice and no attorney-client relationship should be deemed to arise from the receipt this page and/or its associated pages.

 

[Mary Alice McLarty]

[Andrew M. Gross]

 

Copyright © 1996-2007. All Rights Reserved.

Developed and Powered by Internet Concepts®

 
[About the Firm] [Verdicts & Settlements] [Contact Us] [Free Case Review] [Home]