personal injury,dallas personal injury,texas personal injury,personal injury law,lawyer,attorney,wrongful death,school hazing,nursing home negligence, nursing home abuse,rsd,crps, accidents, negligence

 

News & Alerts

RSD Information

Curriculum Vitae

Why I Became a Lawyer

My Practice

Areas Of Practice

Case Facts

Reform Facts

Consumer Update

Attorney Profiles

Notices

_________

Turtle Creek
Centre, Ste 1400
3811 Turtle Creek
Dallas, TX 75219
972.774.9883
888.774.9883

E-Mail Us

Personal Injury Lawyers - Dallas - Texas

Case Facts

THE OTHER SIDE OF THE STORY
FIRE FIGHTERS & LAWSUITS

Fire Fighters Fight Fires, Not "Frivolous" Lawsuits
Fire Fighters afraid to save lives because of liability fears? Don't tell that to the Texas State Association of Fire Fighters, which recently denounced a television ad asserting this falsehood as a "disservice" to Fire Fighters and asked that it be removed from the airwaves.

The claim that Fire Fighters across this country are unduly burdened by civil tort lawsuits is unfounded. Fire Fighters acting within the discretionary scope of their job are generally immune -- it's only egregious actions outside this scope, such as failing to rescue or committing a non-duty violation, that are and should be cause for alarm. Consider, for example, the following cases:

  • Three children died and their parents were seriously injured in Indianapolis when a medicated fire department dispatcher carelessly sent Fire Fighters to the wrong address.
  • An 18-year-old Maryland Fire Fighter died after three volunteer Fire Fighters, conspiring to get her drunk so they could have sex with her, left her inebriated, unattended and uncovered in the rear of a pickup truck in 29-degree weather.

More significant are the numerous examples of Fire Fighters exercising their right to hold wrongdoers that endanger their lives accountable. Here are two examples:

  • A Texas Fire Fighter died of injuries he received while fighting a fire when the high pressure hose on his air pack melted, releasing large amounts of air which not only intensified the fire, but also prevented him from using the air pack, forcing him to breathe toxic Fumes. Caldwell v. U.S. Divers Co.
  • A California Fire Fighter suffered brain damage when a defective gas mask malfunctioned. The manufacturer knew of the defect, but failed to advise the fire department or its distributor. Luttig v. Mine Safety Appliance Co. & Capital Fire Equipment Co.

Potential liability is not what's on Fire Fighters' minds when they race to put out a fire. They're hoping that their equipment works and that their suits hold up to the heat. To be effective, Fire Fighters need to be able to trust that their tools and protective clothing won't fail them and jeopardize their lives. Manufacturers should be concerned about producing the safest products for these heroes of society, not about manipulating American viewers and escaping liability when they make undependable items.

Article Reprinted with Permission from
American Association for Justice

<< Back

 


The statements and information provided on this web site are for the information of the recipient only. This site is not intended to provide legal advice and no attorney-client relationship should be deemed to arise from the receipt this page and/or its associated pages.

 

[Mary Alice McLarty]

[Andrew M. Gross]

 

Copyright © 1996-2007. All Rights Reserved.

Developed and Powered by Internet Concepts®

 
[About the Firm] [Verdicts & Settlements] [Contact Us] [Free Case Review] [Home]